NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts Awards

 Every year, NASA offers preliminary funding to several unusual projects. The NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) program “nurtures visionary ideas that could transform future NASA missions with the creation of breakthroughs – radically better or entirely new aerospace concepts.” Some of the past NIAC award-winning ideas that became a reality include the Ingenuity helicopter now flying on Mars and Cubesats, small one-foot cube satellites that can use smartphones as the onboard computers. You’ve always heard how powerful of a computer your iPhone is! Other funded NIAC proposals include such diverse projects as the 3-D printing of biomaterials such as arrays of cells and a proposal to use the sun as a gravitational lens to study exoplanet surfaces. One idea proposes using bacteria and fungi brought from Earth plus known gases and soil materials on Mars to create bioengineered building materials. This dramatically reduces the weight needed to be sent to Mars to create safe habitats for future Martian astronauts.

NASA awarded 13 new NIAC awards in 2023 for projects beginning this year. The two most exciting for me are a Venus Sample Return mission and sending a cluster of microsatellites to study the nearest exoplanet.

Over four decades ago, the Soviet Union landed multiple Venera probes on Venus. But conditions on Venus quickly overwhelmed them. Surface temperatures reach nearly 900 degrees, hot enough to melt lead. Atmospheric pressure is ninety times that on Earth. Although each of the 10 landers provided valuable information about the planet, the longest-lasting probe, Venera 12, only lasted 110 minutes.

One NIAC award went to a team that wants to use the high-temperature technology developed for probes that study the sun up close plus an innovative rocket engine design that can use fuel created from the gasses in the Venusian atmosphere to return samples from the surface of the planet. Venus may once have been much like Earth, but the runaway greenhouse conditions turned it into a hellish environment. This mission might allow us to better understand the conditions on Venus before that change.

The surface of Venus from Venera 13. Credit Russian Science Academy

The closest star to us, Proxima Centauri, is 4.2 light years, 25 trillion miles, distant. Using our current fastest rocket technology, it would take us more than 50,000 years to reach it. A roughly Earth-sized planet, Proxima Centauri B, orbits the star. One NIAC award went to a group to study the feasibility of sending thousands of tiny spacecraft to study that planet. They plan to power them using a 100-gigawatt laser beamed at the swarm from Earth. The tiny crafts would work together creating the equivalent of a giant dish antenna to send signals back to Earth. They estimate the trip would take only 20 years and data returned at the speed of light requires only 4.2 years.

The nano-spacecraft would take 20 years to reach Alpha Centauri. Credit Breakthrough Starshot

Only a handful of NIAC awards lead to actual NASA missions. I hope these two come to full fruition.

 

Life on Venus? New Evidence Supports the Idea

 In late 2020, a group of scientists led by Jane Greaves at Cardiff University in Wales, U.K., reported finding the gas phosphine (PH3) in the clouds of Venus. This surprised many scientists. On Earth, phosphine has two known sources: a product of microbial decay of organic material or produced in a lab. The surface of Venus bakes at nearly 900 degrees. Thick clouds of sulfuric acid surround the planet. Scientists believe such conditions completely precluded the possibility of life on Venus.

Scientists argued that the discovery must be a mistake, and other researchers who looked for phosphine in Venus’ clouds could not immediately reproduce the discovery. A March 2021 study by Rakesh Mogul of Cal Poly Pomona did find phosphine there.

Still, the controversy raged among scientists. Even if phosphine did occur in the clouds of Venus, detractors said, there must be a geochemical process that creates it that did not involve living organisms.

Venus, credit NASA

Some scientists claim that volcanoes might be a source of phosphine on Venus, which is known to have active volcanoes. Sulfur dioxide in the clouds of Venus comes from volcanoes, but as Greaves says, “The amount of phosphine doesn’t change that much across the various observations. As a comparison, sulfur dioxide, which is believed to be related to volcanism on Venus, can vary wildly, more than 10 times from year to year, or even shorter timescales.”

By comparison, the phosphine varies only by a factor or two. “It is not really variable, and I think that’s important in the context of interpretations,” said Greaves. She adds that the observations come from multiple telescopes, making the observations more robust. As Greaves said, “We now have five detections over the last few years, from three different sets of instruments, and from many methods of processing the data. We’re getting a clue here that there is some steady source (of phosphine).”

As compelling as these observations are, there is still doubt in the minds of many scientists. Follow-up studies are needed, but finding even microbial life elsewhere would be a huge discovery.

 

Each month, I write an astronomy-related column piece for the Oklahoman newspaper. After it is published there, I post that same column to my blog page.

 This is reprinted with permission from the Oklahoman and www.Oklahoman.com.