Measurements Give New Insight into the Structure of the Lunar Crust

Everyone has seen the full Moon in the night sky. The familiar dark splotches called ‘maria,’ Latin for seas, create patterns on the lunar surface. Some people see a man’s face, the Man in the Moon. Others imagine a frog or a rabbit. Whatever you might picture when you look at the full Moon, the pattern of large, dark areas overlying lighter material is quite obvious. The maria are composed of lava that poured out from asteroid impacts and covered the lighter surface material.

The Lunar Nearside, credit NASA

From Earth, we only see the one side of the Moon, so you might assume this arrangement of maria over lighter material continues on the far side of the Moon. Astronomers assumed that, too, until the Russian Luna 3 spacecraft sent back the first, grainy pictures of the lunar far side in 1959. Although there were a few dark patches, they were quite a bit smaller than the familiar maria of the near side and didn’t cover much of the far side surface.

The Lunar Farside, credit NASA

Subsequent studies of the Moon revealed that the crust on the far side is as much as 10 miles (ca. 16 km) thicker than the near side crust. Because of this, asteroids can’t so easily puncture the far side crust, so fewer and smaller maria formed there. For decades, astronomers puzzled as to what might have caused this. Until recently, the best idea was that we originally had two moons. Very early on, the two collided at low speed on the far side. The material from the smaller impacting moon flowed over that side, creating the thicker crust.

Measurements made by the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission in 2012 provided more data, suggesting an impact from an outsider. "The detailed gravity data obtained by GRAIL has given new insight into the structure of the lunar crust underneath the surface," said Meng Hua Zhu, a co-author on the new paper on the subject and a scientist at Macau University of Science and Technology in China. Using computers, the researchers modeled 360 different collisions and compared all the results to what we know about the moon today. The best fit with our Moon suggests that a collision of an object 500-560 miles (ca. 805-901 km) across could have done the trick.

Artists concept of Lunar Farside collision, credit NASA

Luckily for us, there are no other such large objects wandering around near our orbit today.

On or about the first Tuesday of each month, I write an astronomy-related column piece for the Oklahoman newspaper. On the following day, I post that same column to my blog page.

This is reprinted by permission from the Oklahoman and www.newsok.com.